↓ Skip to main content

Validity and reliability of the DDS for severity of delirium in the ICU

Overview of attention for article published in Neurocritical Care, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
Title
Validity and reliability of the DDS for severity of delirium in the ICU
Published in
Neurocritical Care, January 2005
DOI 10.1385/ncc:2:2:150
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hilke Otter, Jörg Martin, Katrin Bäsell, Christian von Heymann, Ortrud Vargas Hein, Patricia Böllert, Pattariya Jänsch, Ina Behnisch, Klaus-Dieter Wernecke, Wolfgang Konertz, Stefan Loening, Jens-Uwe Blohmer, Claudia Spies

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Poland 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 95 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 13%
Other 11 11%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Master 9 9%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Other 23 23%
Unknown 24 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 13%
Neuroscience 5 5%
Engineering 3 3%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 22 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2015.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Neurocritical Care
#866
of 1,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,862
of 151,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurocritical Care
#6
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.