| Title |
Integrated electronic prescribing and robotic dispensing: a case study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
SpringerPlus, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2193-1801-2-295 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Roderick J Beard, Peter Smith |
| Abstract |
To quantify the benefits of electronic prescribing directly linked to a robotic dispensing machine. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 69 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 29% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 11% |
| Researcher | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 10% |
| Professor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 18 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 24% |
| Computer Science | 13 | 18% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 13% |
| Engineering | 7 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 18 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2021.
All research outputs
#6,259,500
of 22,713,403 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#380
of 1,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,836
of 194,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#11
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,713,403 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,852 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.