↓ Skip to main content

Models for calcific aortic valve disease in vivo and in vitro

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Regeneration, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#44 of 191)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
Title
Models for calcific aortic valve disease in vivo and in vitro
Published in
Cell Regeneration, March 2024
DOI 10.1186/s13619-024-00189-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zijin Zhu, Zhirong Liu, Donghui Zhang, Li Li, Jianqiu Pei, Lin Cai

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2024.
All research outputs
#7,811,306
of 25,459,177 outputs
Outputs from Cell Regeneration
#44
of 191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,955
of 182,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Regeneration
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,459,177 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 191 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,939 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.