↓ Skip to main content

Mt. Ebal curse tablet? A refutation of the claims regarding the so called Mt. Ebal curse tablet

Overview of attention for article published in Heritage Science, February 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
Title
Mt. Ebal curse tablet? A refutation of the claims regarding the so called Mt. Ebal curse tablet
Published in
Heritage Science, February 2024
DOI 10.1186/s40494-023-01130-z
Authors

Mark S. Haughwout

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2024.
All research outputs
#8,729,774
of 25,844,815 outputs
Outputs from Heritage Science
#259
of 519 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,654
of 336,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heritage Science
#7
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,844,815 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 519 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,160 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.