| Title |
Prediction of esophagogastroduodenoscopy therapeutic usefulness for in-ICU suspected upper gastrointestinal bleeding: the SUGIBI score study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, February 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-024-01250-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Victor Penaud, Thibault Vieille, Tomas Urbina, Vincent Bonny, Paul Gabarre, Louai Missri, Maxime Gasperment, Jean-Luc Baudel, Nicolas Carbonell, Alexandra Beurton, Sayma Chaibi, Aurélia Retbi, Muriel Fartoukh, Gaël Piton, Bertrand Guidet, Eric Maury, Hafid Ait-Oufella, Jérémie Joffre |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 33% |
| Librarian | 1 | 17% |
| Other | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Linguistics | 2 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,431,860
of 25,541,640 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#454
of 1,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,944
of 297,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#12
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,541,640 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,200 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,542 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.