↓ Skip to main content

Advances in CO2 circulation hydrogen carriers and catalytic processes

Overview of attention for article published in Sustainable Energy Research, February 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Advances in CO2 circulation hydrogen carriers and catalytic processes
Published in
Sustainable Energy Research, February 2024
DOI 10.1186/s40807-024-00102-6
Authors

Seo Ono, Dines Chandra Santra, Ryoichi Kanega, Hajime Kawanami

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2024.
All research outputs
#17,280,155
of 25,362,919 outputs
Outputs from Sustainable Energy Research
#17
of 26 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,436
of 151,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sustainable Energy Research
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,362,919 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.8. This one scored the same or higher as 9 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,969 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them