↓ Skip to main content

A report on palaeontological excavations and sampling in mudrocks: some guidelines

Overview of attention for article published in Swiss Journal of Palaeontology, February 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
A report on palaeontological excavations and sampling in mudrocks: some guidelines
Published in
Swiss Journal of Palaeontology, February 2024
DOI 10.1186/s13358-024-00305-w
Authors

Walter Etter

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2024.
All research outputs
#17,289,919
of 25,390,970 outputs
Outputs from Swiss Journal of Palaeontology
#162
of 178 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,927
of 198,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Swiss Journal of Palaeontology
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,390,970 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 178 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,184 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.