Title |
Bioimpedance-assessed muscle wasting and its relation to nutritional intake during the first week of ICU: a pre-planned secondary analysis of Nutriti Study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, February 2024
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13613-024-01262-w |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Cristian Deana, Jan Gunst, Silvia De Rosa, Michele Umbrello, Matteo Danielis, Daniele Guerino Biasucci, Tommaso Piani, Antonella Cotoia, Alessio Molfino, Luigi Vetrugno |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 3 | 43% |
Japan | 2 | 29% |
Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 3 | 38% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 25% |
Lecturer | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 3 | 38% |
Linguistics | 2 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,315,031
of 25,891,484 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#300
of 1,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,386
of 342,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#11
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,891,484 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,595 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.