| Title |
Palaeogeographic reconstruction of a fluvio-marine transitional system in Narmada rift basin, India — Implications on Late Cretaceous global sea-level rise
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Palaeogeography, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s42501-020-00078-6 |
| Authors |
Biplab Bhattacharya, Suparna Jha, Prantik Mondal |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 17% |
| Professor | 1 | 17% |
| Researcher | 1 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 50% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2024.
All research outputs
#8,515,771
of 25,389,116 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Palaeogeography
#28
of 55 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,667
of 524,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Palaeogeography
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,389,116 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 55 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 524,842 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them