↓ Skip to main content

Interventions to improve appropriateness of laboratory testing in the intensive care unit: a narrative review

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, January 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Interventions to improve appropriateness of laboratory testing in the intensive care unit: a narrative review
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, January 2024
DOI 10.1186/s13613-024-01244-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luigi Devis, Emilie Catry, Patrick M. Honore, Alexandre Mansour, Giuseppe Lippi, François Mullier, Mélanie Closset

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 7 41%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 18%
Lecturer 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 5 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 8 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 6%
Unknown 6 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2024.
All research outputs
#16,015,562
of 25,328,635 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#887
of 1,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,017
of 246,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#22
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,328,635 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,185 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,844 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.