↓ Skip to main content

Scanning acoustic microscopy for material evaluation

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microscopy, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
Title
Scanning acoustic microscopy for material evaluation
Published in
Applied Microscopy, November 2020
DOI 10.1186/s42649-020-00045-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hyunung Yu

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 84 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 14%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Student > Master 4 5%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 41 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 16 19%
Materials Science 9 11%
Physics and Astronomy 4 5%
Chemistry 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 44 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2024.
All research outputs
#8,541,797
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microscopy
#9
of 38 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,242
of 439,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microscopy
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 38 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one scored the same or higher as 29 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them