↓ Skip to main content

Engineering Bacillus subtilis J46 for efficient utilization of galactose through adaptive laboratory evolution

Overview of attention for article published in AMB Express, January 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Engineering Bacillus subtilis J46 for efficient utilization of galactose through adaptive laboratory evolution
Published in
AMB Express, January 2024
DOI 10.1186/s13568-024-01666-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jae Woong Choi, Nho-Eul Song, Sang-pil Hong, Young Kyoung Rhee, Hee-Do Hong, Chang-Won Cho

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 33%
Energy 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2024.
All research outputs
#16,775,211
of 25,443,857 outputs
Outputs from AMB Express
#391
of 1,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,410
of 286,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AMB Express
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,443,857 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,326 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,338 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.