↓ Skip to main content

Rising prevalence of NIDDM in an urban population in India

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetologia, January 1997
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
patent
8 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
224 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
Title
Rising prevalence of NIDDM in an urban population in India
Published in
Diabetologia, January 1997
DOI 10.1007/s001250050668
Authors

A. Ramachandran, C. Snehalatha, E. Latha, V. Vijay, M. Viswanathan

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 73 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 19%
Student > Bachelor 11 15%
Unspecified 11 15%
Student > Postgraduate 10 13%
Other 15 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 32%
Unspecified 16 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Other 14 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2018.
All research outputs
#2,329,325
of 12,996,278 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#1,131
of 3,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,507
of 342,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#46
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,996,278 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,777 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.