| Title |
Rising prevalence of NIDDM in an urban population in India
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Diabetologia, January 1997
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s001250050668 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A. Ramachandran, C. Snehalatha, E. Latha, V. Vijay, M. Viswanathan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 117 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 13% |
| Researcher | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Other | 15 | 13% |
| Unknown | 30 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 15% |
| Unknown | 36 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2018.
All research outputs
#5,446,629
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#2,233
of 5,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,462
of 92,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#6
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,343 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.