↓ Skip to main content

Valuing selected WAItE health states using the Time Trade-Off methodology: findings from an online interviewer-assisted remote survey

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, January 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Valuing selected WAItE health states using the Time Trade-Off methodology: findings from an online interviewer-assisted remote survey
Published in
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, January 2024
DOI 10.1186/s41687-023-00674-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tomos Robinson, Sarah Hill, Giovany Orozco-Leal, Ashleigh Kernohan, William King, Yemi Oluboyede

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 50%
Librarian 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 50%
Unspecified 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2024.
All research outputs
#7,748,445
of 25,168,110 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#168
of 639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,987
of 178,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#5
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,168,110 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.