| Title |
Deep learning predicts cervical lymph node metastasis in clinically node-negative papillary thyroid carcinoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Insights into Imaging, December 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13244-023-01550-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Li-Qiang Zhou, Shu-E. Zeng, Jian-Wei Xu, Wen-Zhi Lv, Dong Mei, Jia-Jun Tu, Fan Jiang, Xin-Wu Cui, Christoph F. Dietrich |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Austria | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2024.
All research outputs
#20,210,106
of 25,698,912 outputs
Outputs from Insights into Imaging
#905
of 1,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#234,228
of 354,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights into Imaging
#34
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,698,912 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,282 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,622 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.