Title |
A review of existing and potential computer user interfaces for modern radiology
|
---|---|
Published in |
Insights into Imaging, May 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/s13244-018-0620-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Antoine Iannessi, Pierre-Yves Marcy, Olivier Clatz, Anne-Sophie Bertrand, Maki Sugimoto |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 102 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 15% |
Researcher | 12 | 12% |
Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
Other | 14 | 14% |
Unknown | 36 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 18 | 18% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 17% |
Engineering | 13 | 13% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 5% |
Psychology | 4 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 7% |
Unknown | 38 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#8,415,382
of 25,139,853 outputs
Outputs from Insights into Imaging
#516
of 1,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,231
of 334,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights into Imaging
#18
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,139,853 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,178 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,199 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.