↓ Skip to main content

Molecular Timing of Primate Divergences as Estimated by Two Nonprimate Calibration Points

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Evolution, December 1998
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
15 Wikipedia pages
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
131 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
Title
Molecular Timing of Primate Divergences as Estimated by Two Nonprimate Calibration Points
Published in
Journal of Molecular Evolution, December 1998
DOI 10.1007/pl00006431
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ulfur Arnason, Anette Gullberg, Axel Janke

Abstract

The complete mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) molecule of the hamadryas baboon, Papio hamadryas, was sequenced and included in a molecular analysis of 24 complete mammalian mtDNAs. The particular aim of the study was to time the divergence between Cercopithecoidea and Hominoidea. That divergence, set at 30 million years before present (MYBP) was a fundamental reference for the original proposal of recent hominoid divergences, according to which the split among gorilla, chimpanzee, and Homo took place 5 MYBP. In the present study the validity of the postulated 30 MYBP dating of the Cercopithecoidea/Hominoidea divergence was examined by applying two independent nonprimate molecular references, the divergence between artiodactyls and cetaceans set at 60 MYBP and that between Equidae and Rhinocerotidae set at 50 MYBP. After calibration for differences in evolutionary rates, application of the two references suggested that the Cercopithecoidea/Hominoidea divergence took place >50 MYBP. Consistent with the marked shift in the dating of the Cercopithecoidea/Hominoidea split, all hominoid divergences receive a much earlier dating. Thus the estimated date of the divergence between Pan (chimpanzee) and Homo is 10-13 MYBP and that between Gorilla and the Pan/Homo linage approximately 17 MYBP. The same datings were obtained in an analysis of clocklike evolving genes. The findings show that recalculation is necessary of all molecular datings based directly or indirectly on a Cercopithecoidea/Hominoidea split 30 MYBP.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Germany 2 2%
Canada 2 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 115 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 22%
Researcher 26 20%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Professor 14 11%
Student > Master 11 8%
Other 27 21%
Unknown 9 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 75 57%
Environmental Science 9 7%
Social Sciences 8 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 5%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 12 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2023.
All research outputs
#5,240,151
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#252
of 1,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,929
of 109,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,477 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,569 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.