↓ Skip to main content

Titanium elastic nailing versus hip spica cast in treatment of femoral-shaft fractures in children

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
Title
Titanium elastic nailing versus hip spica cast in treatment of femoral-shaft fractures in children
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, February 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10195-011-0128-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hamid Reza Shemshaki, Hamid Mousavi, Ghasem Salehi, Mohammad Amin Eshaghi

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 81 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 21%
Student > Postgraduate 16 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Researcher 6 7%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 20 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 44%
Psychology 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 29 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2021.
All research outputs
#7,866,480
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
#60
of 222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,898
of 109,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.