| Title |
Evaluation of Andira inermis stem bark extract for hypoglycaemic and antioxidant effects’
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Phytoscience, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40816-020-00225-5 |
| Authors |
Maxwell Osaronowen Egua, Florence Chimezie Nwinyi, Ode Julius Okwoche, Onakpa Micheal Monday, Akande Motunrayo Ganiyat, Onoja Samuel Okwudili, Mikail Hudu Garba, Akumka David Dezi, Adamu Mohammed |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 25% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 13% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2023.
All research outputs
#8,349,403
of 24,958,301 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Phytoscience
#24
of 69 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,326
of 421,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Phytoscience
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,958,301 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 69 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,462 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.