↓ Skip to main content

Model depiction of the atmospheric flows of radioactive cesium emitted from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station accident

Overview of attention for article published in Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 602)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
35 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Model depiction of the atmospheric flows of radioactive cesium emitted from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station accident
Published in
Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, January 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40645-017-0117-x
Authors

Teruyuki Nakajima, Shota Misawa, Yu Morino, Haruo Tsuruta, Daisuke Goto, Junya Uchida, Toshihiko Takemura, Toshimasa Ohara, Yasuji Oura, Mitsuru Ebihara, Masaki Satoh

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 14 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 13%
Physics and Astronomy 6 13%
Chemistry 3 7%
Engineering 3 7%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 21 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,193,067
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#17
of 602 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,809
of 428,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 602 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them