| Title |
A systematic literature review of open source software quality assessment models
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
SpringerPlus, November 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40064-016-3612-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adewole Adewumi, Sanjay Misra, Nicholas Omoregbe, Broderick Crawford, Ricardo Soto |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 137 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 28 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
| Researcher | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 27 | 20% |
| Unknown | 39 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 55 | 40% |
| Engineering | 17 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 44 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2024.
All research outputs
#5,570,362
of 25,805,386 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#325
of 1,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,596
of 320,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#22
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,805,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,876 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.