| Title |
Computed tomography-based thermography (CTT) in microwave ablation: prediction of the heat ablation zone in the porcine liver
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Insights into Imaging, November 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13244-023-01537-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bogdan Kostyrko, Kerstin Rubarth, Christian Althoff, Franz Gerd Martin Poch, Christina Ann Neizert, Miriam Zibell, Bernhard Gebauer, Kai Siegfried Lehmann, Stefan Markus Niehues, Jürgen Mews, Torsten Diekhoff, Julian Pohlan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Austria | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 50% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 50% |
| Engineering | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2023.
All research outputs
#19,551,848
of 24,909,203 outputs
Outputs from Insights into Imaging
#843
of 1,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,399
of 232,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights into Imaging
#19
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,909,203 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,144 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.