↓ Skip to main content

Item fit statistics for Rasch analysis: can we trust them?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Statistical Distributions and Applications , August 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
Title
Item fit statistics for Rasch analysis: can we trust them?
Published in
Journal of Statistical Distributions and Applications , August 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40488-020-00108-7
Authors

Marianne Müller

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 95 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Student > Master 8 8%
Other 6 6%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Researcher 5 5%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 43 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 13 14%
Social Sciences 10 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 46 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2023.
All research outputs
#17,297,846
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Statistical Distributions and Applications
#25
of 41 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#271,278
of 424,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Statistical Distributions and Applications
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 41 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one scored the same or higher as 16 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them