| Title |
Homology modeling and molecular docking simulation of some novel imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-3-carboxamide (IPA) series as inhibitors of Mycobacterium tuberculosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s43141-020-00102-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mustapha Abdullahi, Shola Elijah Adeniji, David Ebuka Arthur, Abdurrashid Haruna |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 21 | 53% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 15% |
| Unknown | 21 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2023.
All research outputs
#8,541,797
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology
#55
of 348 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203,753
of 523,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 348 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 523,505 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.