The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
Can a personal website be useful as an information source to assess individual scientists? The case of European highly cited researchers
|
---|---|
Published in |
Scientometrics, January 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11192-013-0952-5 |
Authors |
Amalia Más-Bleda, Isidro F. Aguillo |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 8% |
Brazil | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 10 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 58% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 17% |
Scientists | 2 | 17% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 5 | 7% |
United States | 3 | 4% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Russia | 1 | 1% |
Indonesia | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 64 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 12 | 16% |
Librarian | 10 | 13% |
Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 9% |
Other | 20 | 27% |
Unknown | 11 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 23 | 31% |
Computer Science | 19 | 25% |
Arts and Humanities | 3 | 4% |
Engineering | 3 | 4% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
Other | 10 | 13% |
Unknown | 15 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2020.
All research outputs
#4,678,551
of 22,712,476 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#905
of 2,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,807
of 282,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#11
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,712,476 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,667 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,886 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.