| Title |
High-flow nasal cannula oxygen versus conventional oxygen therapy for acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, November 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-023-01208-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sylvain Le Pape, Sigourney Savart, François Arrivé, Jean-Pierre Frat, Stéphanie Ragot, Rémi Coudroy, Arnaud W. Thille |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 10 | 16% |
| Colombia | 8 | 13% |
| Spain | 7 | 11% |
| Ecuador | 3 | 5% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 3 | 5% |
| Japan | 2 | 3% |
| Nicaragua | 1 | 2% |
| Peru | 1 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 24 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 56 | 89% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
| Scientists | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 1 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 6 | 67% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 6 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2023.
All research outputs
#980,071
of 25,827,956 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#107
of 1,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,063
of 369,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#3
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,827,956 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,218 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,208 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.