| Title |
Abietane-type and labdane-type diterpenoids from the cones ofChamaecyparis obtusa
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Wood Science, August 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00831355 |
| Authors |
Jun-ichi Fukushima, Mitsuyoshi Yatagai, Tatsuro Ohira |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 7 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 25% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 13% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 5 | 63% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2023.
All research outputs
#8,310,379
of 24,862,067 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wood Science
#64
of 240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,016
of 46,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wood Science
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,862,067 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 240 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 46,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them