| Title |
The effect of higher or lower mean arterial pressure on kidney function after cardiac arrest: a post hoc analysis of the COMACARE and NEUROPROTECT trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, November 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-023-01210-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Johanna Laurikkala, Koen Ameloot, Matti Reinikainen, Pieter-Jan Palmers, Cathy De Deyne, Ferdinande Bert, Matthias Dupont, Stefan Janssens, Joseph Dens, Johanna Hästbacka, Pekka Jakkula, Pekka Loisa, Thomas Birkelund, Erika Wilkman, Suvi T. Vaara, Markus B. Skrifvars |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 5 | 29% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Finland | 1 | 6% |
| Germany | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 65% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 12% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 13% |
| Professor | 1 | 13% |
| Researcher | 1 | 13% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 13% |
| Other | 2 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 50% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 25% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,326,632
of 25,706,302 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#302
of 1,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,038
of 364,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#11
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,706,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,208 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.