↓ Skip to main content

Classification of nasal polyps and inverted papillomas using CT-based radiomics

Overview of attention for article published in Insights into Imaging, November 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Classification of nasal polyps and inverted papillomas using CT-based radiomics
Published in
Insights into Imaging, November 2023
DOI 10.1186/s13244-023-01536-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mengqi Guo, Xuefeng Zang, Wenting Fu, Haoyi Yan, Xiangyuan Bao, Tong Li, Jianping Qiao

Abstract

Nasal polyp (NP) and inverted papilloma (IP) are two common types of nasal masses. And their differentiation is essential for determining optimal surgical strategies and predicting outcomes. Thus, we aimed to develop several radiomic models to differentiate them based on computed tomography (CT)-extracted radiomic features. A total of 296 patients with nasal polyps or papillomas were enrolled in our study. Radiomics features were extracted from non-contrast CT images. For feature selection, three methods including Boruta, random forest, and correlation coefficient were used. We choose three models, namely SVM, naive Bayes, and XGBoost, to perform binary classification on the selected features. And the data was validated with tenfold cross-validation. Then, the performance was assessed by receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve and related parameters. In this study, the performance ability of the models was in the following order: XGBoost > SVM > Naive Bayes. And the XGBoost model showed excellent AUC performance at 0.922, 0.9078, 0.9184, and 0.9141 under four conditions (no feature selection, Boruta, random forest, and correlation coefficient). We demonstrated that CT-based radiomics plays a crucial role in distinguishing IP from NP. It can provide added diagnostic value by distinguishing benign nasal lesions and reducing the need for invasive diagnostic procedures and may play a vital role in guiding personalized treatment strategies and developing optimal therapies. Based on the extraction of radiomic features of tumor regions from non-contrast CT, optimized by radiomics to achieve non-invasive classification of IP and NP which provide support for respective therapy of IP and NP. • CT images are commonly used to diagnose IP and NP. • Radiomics excels in feature extraction and analysis. • CT-based radiomics can be applied to distinguish IP from NP. • Use multiple feature selection methods and classifier models. • Derived from real clinical cases with abundant data.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 43%
Unknown 4 57%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 14%
Environmental Science 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2023.
All research outputs
#15,404,089
of 24,887,826 outputs
Outputs from Insights into Imaging
#644
of 1,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,315
of 222,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights into Imaging
#10
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,887,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,143 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,487 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.