Title |
The effect of unilateral chest drainage for transpulmonary pressure during mechanical ventilation
|
---|---|
Published in |
JA Clinical Reports, October 2023
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40981-023-00664-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Takayuki Hasegawa, Yuzo Iseki, Atsuyuki Hosono, Satoki Inoue |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 3 | 33% |
Unknown | 6 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 1 | 100% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2023.
All research outputs
#6,618,883
of 25,522,520 outputs
Outputs from JA Clinical Reports
#17
of 229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,201
of 360,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JA Clinical Reports
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,522,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 229 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,287 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.