↓ Skip to main content

How well do supranational regional grouping schemes fit international business research models?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of International Business Studies, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
Title
How well do supranational regional grouping schemes fit international business research models?
Published in
Journal of International Business Studies, May 2013
DOI 10.1057/jibs.2013.16
Authors

Ricardo Flores, Ruth V Aguilera, Arash Mahdian, Paul M Vaaler

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
United States 1 2%
New Zealand 1 2%
Unknown 60 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 26%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 20%
Student > Master 10 15%
Unspecified 7 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 8%
Other 13 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 42 65%
Unspecified 10 15%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 11%
Social Sciences 5 8%
Design 1 2%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2013.
All research outputs
#11,592,814
of 13,048,323 outputs
Outputs from Journal of International Business Studies
#532
of 561 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,947
of 122,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of International Business Studies
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,048,323 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 561 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,805 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.