↓ Skip to main content

Load sharing and weakest lamina effects on the compressive resistance of cross-laminated timber under in-plane loading

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Wood Science, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Load sharing and weakest lamina effects on the compressive resistance of cross-laminated timber under in-plane loading
Published in
Journal of Wood Science, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10086-018-1741-9
Authors

Sung-Jun Pang, Gi Young Jeong

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 16%
Student > Master 3 16%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Other 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 7 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 8 42%
Unspecified 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Unknown 8 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2023.
All research outputs
#8,239,130
of 24,682,395 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wood Science
#64
of 237 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,029
of 332,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wood Science
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,682,395 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 237 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.