| Title |
Effect of caffeine on delayed-onset muscle soreness: a meta-analysis of RCT
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Bulletin of the National Research Centre, November 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s42269-021-00660-5 |
| Authors |
Janisa Andrea Muljadi, Patsorn Kaewphongsri, Kornkit Chaijenkij, Jatupon Kongtharvonskul |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
| Researcher | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 58% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2023.
All research outputs
#3,527,480
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of the National Research Centre
#26
of 167 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,889
of 514,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of the National Research Centre
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 167 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 514,406 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.