↓ Skip to main content

Review of failure modes in supercritical geothermal drilling projects

Overview of attention for article published in Geothermal Energy, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
Title
Review of failure modes in supercritical geothermal drilling projects
Published in
Geothermal Energy, December 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40517-018-0113-4
Authors

Michal Kruszewski, Volker Wittig

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 85 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 14%
Researcher 10 12%
Lecturer 4 5%
Unspecified 3 4%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 32 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 20 24%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 13%
Energy 8 9%
Unspecified 3 4%
Chemical Engineering 2 2%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 33 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2023.
All research outputs
#16,709,989
of 24,576,899 outputs
Outputs from Geothermal Energy
#76
of 199 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#275,325
of 445,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geothermal Energy
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,576,899 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,816 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.