| Title |
A review of challenges and solutions in the preparation and use of magnetorheological fluids
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40712-019-0109-2 |
| Authors |
James Sathya Kumar, P. Sam Paul, Girish Raghunathan, Divin George Alex |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 202 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 7% |
| Researcher | 10 | 5% |
| Professor | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 31 | 15% |
| Unknown | 88 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 65 | 32% |
| Materials Science | 12 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 7 | 3% |
| Chemical Engineering | 5 | 2% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Unknown | 95 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2024.
All research outputs
#5,423,460
of 25,366,663 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Mechanical and Materials Engineering
#2
of 22 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,099
of 473,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Mechanical and Materials Engineering
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,366,663 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one scored the same or higher as 20 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,907 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them