↓ Skip to main content

The “chi-chi” of Ginkgo biloba L. grows downward with horizontally curving tracheids having compression-wood-like features

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Wood Science, August 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
The “chi-chi” of Ginkgo biloba L. grows downward with horizontally curving tracheids having compression-wood-like features
Published in
Journal of Wood Science, August 2023
DOI 10.1186/s10086-023-02102-4
Authors

Seiichi Higuchi, Dan Aoki, Yasuyuki Matsushita, Masato Yoshida, Sachie Yagami, Kazuhiko Fukushima

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 50%
Researcher 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 50%
Engineering 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2023.
All research outputs
#17,301,727
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wood Science
#195
of 245 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,185
of 353,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wood Science
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 245 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,632 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them