| Title |
The Beneficial Effects of Physical Activity: Is It Down to Your Genes? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Twin and Family Studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Sports Medicine - Open, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40798-016-0073-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J. R. Zadro, D. Shirley, T. B. Andrade, K. J Scurrah, A. Bauman, P. H. Ferreira |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 12% |
| Australia | 5 | 8% |
| Canada | 3 | 5% |
| Ireland | 3 | 5% |
| Spain | 3 | 5% |
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Finland | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 17% |
| Unknown | 23 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 49% |
| Scientists | 23 | 39% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 80 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 13% |
| Researcher | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 11% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 16 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 18% |
| Sports and Recreations | 12 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 22 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2018.
All research outputs
#1,276,083
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine - Open
#123
of 611 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,138
of 430,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine - Open
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 611 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,253 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.