↓ Skip to main content

Mimicking Alpine thrusts by passive deformation of synsedimentary normal faults: a record of the Jurassic extension of the European margin (Mont Fort nappe, Pennine Alps)

Overview of attention for article published in Swiss Journal of Geosciences, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Mimicking Alpine thrusts by passive deformation of synsedimentary normal faults: a record of the Jurassic extension of the European margin (Mont Fort nappe, Pennine Alps)
Published in
Swiss Journal of Geosciences, September 2020
DOI 10.1186/s00015-020-00366-2
Authors

Adrien Pantet, Jean-Luc Epard, Henri Masson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 29%
Researcher 5 29%
Professor 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 3 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 65%
Unspecified 1 6%
Unknown 5 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2023.
All research outputs
#8,137,565
of 24,406,515 outputs
Outputs from Swiss Journal of Geosciences
#60
of 180 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,294
of 416,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Swiss Journal of Geosciences
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,406,515 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 180 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them