The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 324 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
| Title |
Methods for the estimation of loss of life due to floods: a literature review and a proposal for a new method
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Natural Hazards, April 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11069-008-9227-5 |
| Authors |
S. N. Jonkman, J. K. Vrijling, A. C. W. M. Vrouwenvelder |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 3 | <1% |
| Belgium | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 309 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 57 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 52 | 16% |
| Researcher | 51 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 4% |
| Other | 46 | 14% |
| Unknown | 84 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 94 | 29% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 49 | 15% |
| Environmental Science | 37 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 10 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 6% |
| Unknown | 102 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2022.
All research outputs
#9,032,478
of 26,613,602 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#1,065
of 2,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,109
of 87,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#6
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,613,602 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 87,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.