| Title |
Reproducing ancient Chinese ink depending on gelatin/chitosan and modern experimental methodology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Heritage Science, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40494-022-00739-w |
| Authors |
Zhen Liu, Kun Liu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 13% |
| Researcher | 1 | 13% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 13% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2023.
All research outputs
#16,552,221
of 24,353,295 outputs
Outputs from Heritage Science
#349
of 462 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#246,973
of 423,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heritage Science
#9
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,353,295 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 462 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,172 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.