| Title |
Pictorial blood loss assessment chart for quantification of menstrual blood loss: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Gynecological Surgery, May 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10397-015-0893-5 |
| Authors |
Sherif A. El-Nashar, Sherif A. M. Shazly, Abimbola O. Famuyide |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 11% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 21% |
| Unknown | 13 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 49% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 12 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,194,225
of 24,393,299 outputs
Outputs from Gynecological Surgery
#5
of 165 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,103
of 268,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gynecological Surgery
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,393,299 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 165 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,888 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them