↓ Skip to main content

No difference in load to failure or stiffness between transosseous tunnels, suture anchors, and cortical buttons for pectoralis major tendon repair: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics, May 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
Title
No difference in load to failure or stiffness between transosseous tunnels, suture anchors, and cortical buttons for pectoralis major tendon repair: a systematic review & meta‐analysis
Published in
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics, May 2023
DOI 10.1186/s40634-023-00617-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sean B. Sequeira, Lynette M. Sequeira, Mark D. Wieland, Casey M. Imbergamo, Kenneth Tepper

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2023.
All research outputs
#19,175,871
of 24,416,081 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
#264
of 394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,324
of 367,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
#10
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,416,081 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 394 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.