↓ Skip to main content

Influence of perioperative complication severity on 1- and 2-year outcomes of low back surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Influence of perioperative complication severity on 1- and 2-year outcomes of low back surgery
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, November 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10195-016-0436-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

James Grainger, Thomas Hammett, Robert Isaacs, Chad Cook

Abstract

Several factors potentially influence outcomes of surgery, including perioperative complications. Complications may take many forms and the Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification is designed to categorize them by degree of severity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of perioperative complications by severity categorization on the 1-and 2-year pain and disability outcomes for patients who received low back surgery. Data used for the study involved a purposive sample (N = 477; 8.1%) from a spine outcomes registry of 5876 patients who received spine surgery and encountered complications. All complications were categorized using the CD classification and were collapsed according to distribution frequencies, i.e., Grade I-II and Grade III-V. Adjusted and unadjusted regression analyses were used to determine the association between CD classification and 1- and 2-year outcomes. The majority of surgical complications were Grade III-V (N = 358; 75.1%), with two incidences in which death occurred. For the unadjusted models, there were no significant associations between CD classification categorizations for 1-year outcomes; however, 2-year outcomes were significantly worse (P <0.05) for those with Grade III-V categorization. When adjusted and controlled for baseline characteristics, CD classification did not influence 1-or 2-year pain and disability outcomes. When control variables are considered, the severity of perioperative surgical complications does not appear to influence 1- or 2-year pain and disability outcomes. Level 4.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 17%
Researcher 3 17%
Other 1 6%
Lecturer 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 5 28%
Unknown 4 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 22%
Sports and Recreations 1 6%
Neuroscience 1 6%
Engineering 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 28%