| Title |
A systematic review and research perspective on recommender systems
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Big Data, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40537-022-00592-5 |
| Authors |
Deepjyoti Roy, Mala Dutta |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 540 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 540 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 46 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 4% |
| Lecturer | 20 | 4% |
| Other | 54 | 10% |
| Unknown | 332 | 61% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 96 | 18% |
| Unspecified | 49 | 9% |
| Engineering | 19 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 10 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 23 | 4% |
| Unknown | 334 | 62% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2024.
All research outputs
#4,409,819
of 25,802,847 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Big Data
#80
of 397 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,756
of 449,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Big Data
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,802,847 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 397 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,002 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.