↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of Exercise Treatments with or without Adjuncts for Common Lower Limb Tendinopathies: A Living Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine - Open, August 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 629)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
144 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Effectiveness of Exercise Treatments with or without Adjuncts for Common Lower Limb Tendinopathies: A Living Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis
Published in
Sports Medicine - Open, August 2023
DOI 10.1186/s40798-023-00616-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dimitris Challoumas, Gearoid Crosbie, Seth O’Neill, Carles Pedret, Neal L. Millar

Abstract

Exercise therapy is usually prescribed as first-line treatment for lower limb tendinopathies. The multitude of exercise- and non-exercise-based management options can be overwhelming for the treating sports professional and patient alike. We chose to investigate the comparative effectiveness of exercise therapy with or without adjuncts for managing the commonest lower limb tendinopathies. Through an extensive systematic literature search using multiple databases, we aimed to identify eligible randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on Achilles tendinopathy, patellar tendinopathy or greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS) that included at least one exercise intervention in their treatment arms. Our primary outcomes were patient-reported pain and function (Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment; VISA). Follow-up was defined as short-term (≤ 12 weeks), mid-term (> 12 weeks to < 12 months) and long-term (≥ 12 months). The risk of bias and strength of evidence were assessed with the Cochrane Collaboration and GRADE-NMA tools, respectively. Analyses were performed separately for each one of the three tendinopathies. A total of 68 RCTs were included in the systematic review. All pairwise comparisons that demonstrated statistically and clinically significant differences between interventions were based on low or very low strength of evidence. Based on evidence of moderate strength, the addition of extracorporeal shockwave therapy to eccentric exercise in patellar tendinopathy was associated with no short-term benefit in pain or VISA-P. From the network meta-analyses, promising interventions such as slow resistance exercise and therapies administered alongside eccentric exercise, such as topical glyceryl trinitrate for patellar tendinopathy and high-volume injection with corticosteroid for Achilles tendinopathy were based on low/very low strength of evidence. In this network meta-analysis, we found no convincing evidence that any adjuncts administered on their own or alongside exercise are more effective than exercise alone. Therefore, we recommend that exercise monotherapy continues to be offered as first-line treatment for patients with Achilles and patellar tendinopathies and GTPS for at least 3 months before an adjunct is considered. We provide treatment recommendations for each tendinopathy. PROSPERO registration number CRD42021289534.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 144 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 7 16%
Other 7 16%
Researcher 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 19 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 7 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 18 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 89. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2024.
All research outputs
#490,880
of 25,888,937 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine - Open
#47
of 629 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,292
of 362,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine - Open
#3
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,888,937 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 629 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.