↓ Skip to main content

Initial evaluation of [18F]-FACBC for PET imaging of multiple myeloma

Overview of attention for article published in EJNMMI Research, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Initial evaluation of [18F]-FACBC for PET imaging of multiple myeloma
Published in
EJNMMI Research, January 2022
DOI 10.1186/s13550-022-00876-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Volker Morath, Michael Heider, Markus Mittelhäuser, Hannes Rolbieski, Jacob Stroh, Jérémie Calais, Matthias Eiber, Florian Bassermann, Wolfgang A. Weber

Timeline
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 29%
Researcher 2 29%
Student > Postgraduate 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 57%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2023.
All research outputs
#8,062,481
of 24,220,739 outputs
Outputs from EJNMMI Research
#163
of 590 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,513
of 507,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EJNMMI Research
#7
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,220,739 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 590 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 507,378 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.