↓ Skip to main content

Methodology to determine the parameters of historical earthquakes in China

Overview of attention for article published in Geoscience Letters, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Methodology to determine the parameters of historical earthquakes in China
Published in
Geoscience Letters, February 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40562-017-0071-x
Authors

Jian Wang, Guoliang Lin, Zhe Zhang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 50%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Researcher 1 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 2 25%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 25%
Engineering 2 25%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2023.
All research outputs
#21,702,196
of 24,219,576 outputs
Outputs from Geoscience Letters
#200
of 208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#277,311
of 315,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geoscience Letters
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,219,576 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 208 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.