↓ Skip to main content

Early Childhood Education Policy Development in China

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
Title
Early Childhood Education Policy Development in China
Published in
International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/2288-6729-5-1-29
Authors

Xin Zhou

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 106 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 13%
Researcher 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Student > Bachelor 4 4%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 35 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 25 24%
Arts and Humanities 10 9%
Psychology 5 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 4%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 40 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2016.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy
#83
of 143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,471
of 270,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy
#17
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 143 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,894 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.