| Title |
Analysis of the two-point discrimination test in daily routine practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Plastic Surgery, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00238-016-1265-8 |
| Authors |
Cedric E Boesch, Fabian Medved, Manuel Held, Dominik Bender, Hans-Eberhard Schaller, Thomas Fuchsberger |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 36% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 4% |
| Researcher | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 52% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Psychology | 1 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2022.
All research outputs
#4,187,536
of 23,164,913 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Plastic Surgery
#30
of 481 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,359
of 422,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Plastic Surgery
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,164,913 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 481 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,464 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them