↓ Skip to main content

Eliciting renal tenderness by sonopalpation in diagnosing acute pyelonephritis

Overview of attention for article published in The Ultrasound Journal, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
29 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Eliciting renal tenderness by sonopalpation in diagnosing acute pyelonephritis
Published in
The Ultrasound Journal, January 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13089-016-0056-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeremy S. Faust, James W. Tsung

Abstract

Diagnosing acute pyelonephritis relies on the combination of historical, physical, and laboratory findings. Costovertebral angle tenderness is important, although its accuracy is unknown. Point-of-care ultrasound-guided palpation (sonopalpation) may aid clinicians in localizing pain to discrete anatomic structures in cases of suspected acute pyelonephritis lacking classic features. We describe three low-to-moderate pre-test probability cases wherein maximal tenderness was elicited by renal sonopalpation, aiding in the diagnosis of acute pyelonephritis. In a fourth case, absence of renal tenderness to sonopalpation in a patient exhibiting typical acute pyelonephritis features led to an alternate diagnosis. Therefore, renal sonopalpation may be useful in confirming or refuting suspected cases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 24%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 16%
Student > Master 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 7 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Unknown 9 36%